...so I've begun pursuing my high school Biology teaching license.
Needless to say, I've learned a few things along the way. I've expressed some of these ideas to members of my MAT cohort, and judging by their interest, I've become even more excited to share them. Perhaps my interest has bubbled over into my first blog post in a very long time, but I must say, I wish someone had been able to share these ideas with me at the turbulent age of sixteen.
My ideas are not new or unique. A 2007 survey of high school Biology teachers revealed that over half (51.5%) believe that God guided evolutionary processes occurring over billions of years. Only about a third of America in general feels this way. I'm one voice of many, so why are we not heard? Why is it when I talk to my fellow grad students about this, their eyes get wide and they start asking amazing questions? Is there some underlying belief, however deep, that you can't really be a practicing Christian and a firm believer in Darwin's views?
I want so dearly to combat this. I don't want kids to feel like they have to choose between their faith or the fascinating world of science. What follows is a short list of what I want to tell them. Please feel free to give your feedback, as this list is not exhaustive.
What I wish I would have known in High School Biology
Creationists are not going extinct
America said "Yea God" over three decades of research.
If you believe the earth was purposely created, you are among the majority in America. I won't pretend I never felt the occasional sting of a teacher's comment on Christian ignorance, but let's be realistic in our assessment of the situation. Prejudice happens, but it happens both ways. The aforementioned survey of biology teachers revealed that more feel pressured not to teach Evolution (17.9%) than those who feel pressured not to teach Creationism (13.6%).
Evolution does not explain the origin of life. Darwin hypothesized about this, saying that life could have started in some "warm pond" somewhere. But Evolution is the theory that species adapt and change over time in response to their environments. No origins required.
Nor is it "just a theory"
I was told this over and over, but by the time high school rolled around, it was little comfort to me. Yes, we still refer to this process as the Theory of Evolution. But to call it "just a theory" reveals a lack of knowledge about the scientific process, and makes you look silly to the VERY small group of those who I refer to as "militant anti-creationists" (Freedom from Religion Foundation and their notable Ball State incident, for example.) Scientific theories are tested and tested and tested. The more viable theories are the ones that last.
Proof is a strong word
Neither faith nor science, by definition, can be proven.
Let's imagine a man who genuinely believes the lochness monster exists. A scientist may come along and tell this man he is wrong, but can the scientist disprove the man? She can cite facts, raise the question of the chances of such a creature living so long, so hidden from modern means of detection, but to prove the non-existence of the lochness monster is impossible.
Now let's imagine that same man attempts to prove to our scientist that Nessy does exist. He tells about the numerous times he's seen this creature, so why is our scientist not convinced? No facts. It's an experience that the man had, and he can't verify an experience.
So it is in our current debate. It's why the 2014 Ken Ham/ Bill Nye debate was like watching a western shoot-out with pop guns. They kept missing each other. Their arguments fell short because they each only knew how to argue from their own extreme perspectives: all faith or all science. But what if we could blend the two? What if we could have faith and science?
You can have faith and science!
As a person raised Christian, I eventually chose Christianity for myself because I felt God's presence in my life. I can't verify that. I've felt His comfort literally rush through me when I sit quietly in prayer. Dopamine, you say? Released at the supposition of a mystical experience? Certainly, but who's to say God cannot cause chemical joy in our bodies at the realization of his presence? If I believe we are body and soul, matter and spirit, is it a surprise that I would need both the seen and the unseen to understand myself? And is this not a way that God would chose to reach us, knowing just how we are?
Much love,
Libby
Sources:
Plutzer, Eric and Michael B. Berkman. National Survey of High School Biology Teachers, 2007. Public use data file; January 12, 2010 release. Retrieved May 2014 from
http://www.thearda.com/Archive/files/Codebooks/HSBIOL_CB.asp
Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design. (n.d.). Gallup.com. Retrieved May 2014 from
http://www.gallup.com/poll/21814/evolution-creationism-intelligent-design.aspx
